AirOps does not publish what its Solo or Pro plans cost. Its own pricing page shows a free tier at $0 and marks every other plan "Custom," with no dollar figure attached. Two independent reviews checked in 2026, Profound and Surfer SEO, both report Solo at $200 a month and Pro at $2,000, a tenfold jump for the step that adds more than one AI engine.
Disclosure: GetIntel is an AI visibility tool and competes with AirOps in the broader AI-search-optimization category, though the two products differ in scope. AirOps figures below come from airops.com/pricing, checked 29 August 2026, plus two independent reviews (Profound, 17 January 2026; Surfer SEO, updated 22 April 2026) for the two tiers AirOps itself won't price. GetIntel figures are our own, current as published.
What Does AirOps Actually Publish on Its Own Pricing Page?
One number and four blanks. AirOps' pricing page lists five plans, and only the free one carries a visible price.
| Plan | Price on airops.com | Key limits |
|---|---|---|
| Insights (Free) | $0/month | 1 user, 1 brand kit, 5 knowledge base sources |
| Solo | Not shown | 100 tracked prompts and pages, ChatGPT insights only |
| Pro (labeled "Recommended") | Not shown | 250 tracked prompts and pages, multi-engine insights |
| Pages | Custom, contact sales | Unlimited users |
| Enterprise | Custom, contact sales | Custom prompt limits, dedicated account manager |
AirOps' published pricing tiers, read from airops.com/pricing on 29 August 2026.
Solo and Pro are the two plans most buyers would actually land on, and both are the ones AirOps declines to price on its own site. The page describes what each includes in detail (task allowances, brand kits, integrations) without ever stating what either costs.
What Do Solo and Pro Actually Cost, Since AirOps Won't Say?
$200 a month for Solo and $2,000 for Pro, according to Profound (17 January 2026) and Surfer SEO (updated 22 April 2026), two independent reviews that checked directly rather than relying on AirOps' own pricing page.
| Solo | Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (per Profound, Surfer SEO) | $200/month | $2,000/month |
| Tracked prompts and pages | 100 | 250 |
| Engine coverage | ChatGPT only | Google, Perplexity, OpenAI, Google AI Studio |
| Content production tasks | 20,000/month | 75,000/month |
| Seats | Single-user | Unlimited team seats |
| Reporting | Monthly opportunity reports | Weekly opportunity reports |
Reported by Profound's AirOps review (17 January 2026) and Surfer SEO's AirOps review (updated 22 April 2026); both independently state the same two figures.
Two reviewers landing on identical numbers, months apart, is a reasonable basis for treating $200 and $2,000 as real, even though AirOps itself never confirms them. Neither review notes an annual discount, and AirOps' own page gives no billing-cycle option beyond "monthly."
Why Is the Jump from $200 to $2,000 So Large?
Because the tier boundary gates engine count, and AirOps' Solo plan is capped at exactly one.
AirOps' Solo tier tracks ChatGPT only. Pro adds Google, Perplexity, OpenAI's other surfaces, and Google AI Studio, four more engines for a tenfold price increase. That is a steeper version of a pattern that shows up across this category: the cheapest tier buys visibility into a single AI answer engine, and multi-engine coverage sits behind a much larger number. What engine tiers actually buy covers why that gate matters more than the price difference alone suggests, using GetIntel's own coverage data.
There is no published middle step. A Solo customer who wants a second engine cannot add one; the next available plan is Pro, at ten times the price and with a use case (unlimited seats, weekly reporting, 3.75x the task allowance) built for a team rather than an individual evaluating a second engine.
How Does AirOps' Pricing Compare to GetIntel or Profound?
GetIntel publishes all three of its prices; AirOps publishes one out of five.
GetIntel's tiers are $29, $49 and $99 a month, all stated on its own pricing page, with four answer engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, included from the $29 Starter tier. A fifth engine, Claude, joins on the $99 Growth tier. Profound's pricing sits between the two: $99 and $399 published directly, with Enterprise the only unpriced tier.
AirOps is the most opaque of the three. Its own page prices only the free plan and the two enterprise-scale tiers marked "Custom," leaving Solo and Pro, the two a self-serve buyer would actually choose between, unpriced anywhere except in third-party reviews. Positioned as "AI Search for Enterprise," that omission tracks with the target buyer: a procurement-driven purchase where the number gets negotiated on a call rather than compared on a page.
What Doesn't AirOps' Pricing Page Tell You?
Three things worth asking before a sales call, since the page itself won't answer them.
- What a "task" is worth. Both AirOps' Solo (20,000/month) and Pro (75,000/month) meter usage in tasks, with a stated overage of $0.025 per additional task on Solo, per Surfer SEO's review. Pro's overage rate isn't published, and neither review confirms one exists.
- Whether Pages sits between Pro and Enterprise on price, or simply extends Pro's feature set at custom pricing. AirOps' own page lists it as a distinct tier without positioning it against the other two.
- Whether annual billing exists at all. Neither AirOps' page nor either review mentions a yearly option; every figure reported is monthly.
How Did We Check AirOps' Pricing?
AirOps' published tier structure and free-plan pricing came from airops.com/pricing, read 29 August 2026. The $200 and $2,000 figures for Solo and Pro are not on that page; they come from Profound's AirOps review (17 January 2026) and Surfer SEO's AirOps review (updated 22 April 2026), which independently report the same two numbers. GetIntel's own pricing is published on our own site and current as of this article's publish date.
We compete with AirOps in the same category, which is why the third-party figures are cited by source and date rather than presented as confirmed. If AirOps publishes its own Solo and Pro pricing in the future, that would supersede the reviewer-reported numbers here.