For Marketing Teams

Report on AI search the way you report on everything else.

Every buyer topic in your category scored daily across the AI engines, the rivals winning each one, and a ranked list of drafted work your team can actually run. Exportable to Looker Studio, an API and MCP.

We run 60 AI checks (20 buyer questions × 3 engines) to see if you get named.

~2 min · No signup

Trusted by

Founders and agencies already using GetIntel

KissflowKidPROMagicbricksIntrycksRingOwlimplo.aiStatNexaPRonto MarketingMoEngageKissflowKidPROMagicbricksIntrycksRingOwlimplo.aiStatNexaPRonto MarketingMoEngage
The problem

Nobody can tell you how the brand is doing in AI search.

A screenshot of ChatGPT naming a competitor is alarming but unusable. It is not a measurement, it does not trend, and it gives whoever has to fix it nowhere to start.

Coverage

A map of your category, not one number.

Buyer questions are grouped into topics and each topic is scored on its own, every day. That turns a vague worry into something specific: these topics are ours, these are contested, and these belong to a rival right now.

  • Every topic scored separately, with its own trend
  • The rivals AI names per topic, not just overall
  • Head-to-heads: who the engines pick when compared directly
  • The pages and sources AI cites when it answers
Reporting

Numbers that leave the dashboard.

AI visibility only matters internally if it can sit in the deck beside everything else. The connector, the template, the API and the MCP server exist so the data lands where your reporting already lives. See the Looker Studio setup.

  • Looker Studio connector with a ready-made template
  • White-label and scheduled reports
  • API and MCP access for your own stack or agent
  • A shareable report link anyone can open without an account
See the reporting
How it works

Work your team can divide.

The measurement is automatic. What comes out of it is briefed work with an owner, not a list of observations. See a 20-minute weekly routine for running it.

01

Topics get built and scored

Your buyer questions are grouped into topics and scanned daily across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews.

02

Gaps get ranked

The weakest topics become tasks ordered by likely impact, split across On-page, Off-page, UGC and Technical.

03

Each task arrives drafted

Writers get a brief with the angle and the facts. Technical work ships as a reviewable diff through your coding agent.

04

The trend gets reported

Topic scores, competitor share and AI traffic flow into Looker Studio, scheduled reports or your own API queries.

What else lands

The signals a content calendar cannot see.

Brand perception

How the engines describe you in their own words, not just whether they rank you.

Reddit and community

The threads AI quotes when answering your category questions, and which ones are worth joining.

Source intelligence

Which publications and pages the engines lean on, so off-page work targets the right places.

AI crawlers and visitors

Which AI crawlers read your site and which visitors arrive from AI answers, from your own Cloudflare or GA4 data.

Technical scan

Rendering and crawlability problems that keep good pages out of AI answers entirely.

Unlimited seats

Everyone who owns a piece of the work reads from the same topics and the same ranked list.

Testimonials

Don't just take our word for it

Founders and agencies turning AI blind spots into shipped fixes, not backlog items.

The tool is amazing for our clients. We have been able to give them exact insights, and the tool has worked brilliantly.

Paul Williamson

Growth Marketing, PRonto Marketing

The tool helped me improve my citations from 0 to 3% in six weeks. It is clear and helps us understand what to do next.

Mukul Chaware

Founder, Ringowl

We tried other tools and none of them had Reddit. We tried using the Reddit part and found it useful.

Dhairya Bagga

SEO Head, Magicbricks

The interface is simple and easy to understand. The actionable recommendations make it easier to move from identifying an issue to taking corrective action.

Nihit Agarwala

SEO/GEO/AEO Lead, TMRW House of Brands

The tool is very interesting and we love how it shows the AI visibility and the prompts. Love using the tool.

Aashik M

Lead SEO, Kissflow

The interface is amazing, and the cost helps us keep our margins. Love using the tool.

Bob Brennan

CEO, Intrycks

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

It sits beside it rather than replacing it. Your SEO tools measure Google rankings and backlinks. GetIntel measures whether the AI engines name you when a buyer asks, topic by topic, and turns the gaps into drafted work. The output lands in Looker Studio, an API and an MCP server, so it reports next to the numbers you already track.

Yes. Pro and Growth include unlimited seats, so the person who owns content, the person who owns the site and the person who presents the numbers can all work from the same topics and the same task list. Monitor is a two-seat plan intended for one owner.

You do, and that is deliberate. Each task arrives drafted: the comparison page, the community answer, the outreach note, the technical fix. Your writers get a brief they can run rather than a blank page, and anything technical can ship as a reviewable diff through Claude Code or Cursor. Nothing publishes without approval.

Pro tracks 60 and Growth tracks 120. The question count is really category coverage: more questions means more topics scored and fewer blind spots in the part of the market you care about. Growth also adds Claude as a fifth engine, refreshed weekly.

Partly, and we would rather be precise about it. GetIntel shows which AI crawlers reach your site and which visitors arrive from AI answers, using your own Cloudflare or GA4 data. That is real traffic evidence. Attribution from an AI answer to a closed deal is not something any tool in this category can honestly claim end to end.

Put a number on your AI visibility.

7-day free trial on 25 buyer questions. Pro $79 with unlimited seats, Growth $149 for 120 questions and a fifth engine.